Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | WithinReason's commentslogin

Here, try your hand at assembling one much cheaper at the same performance:

https://pcpartpicker.com/


I just did one [0], mostly with regards only to specs and price (rather than quality). It comes out to $150 more, roughly 4X the volume, and about 3 hours more of my time in effort, all to get something that won't be as well-supported by games. What am I missing?

[0] https://pcpartpicker.com/list/KY3VW9


I don't recognized the CPU/GPU and PC building isn't my field so I could way off. But here's my honest attempt at it without paying a premium for the form factor which isn't an important feature for me:

PCPartPicker Part List: https://pcpartpicker.com/list/3WkCdq

Price: $1021


Yeah. That's great,but I think it gets a bit expensive if you try to go small form factor and silent. You need more premium parts for that.

So if you want something small, it's a bit more expensive


As observed by archaeologist John Younger, the entire Linear A corpus takes up only 1.84 pages of letter paper when typeset in 12 point font and 1-inch margins.

Also, just pick the longest answer :)

81,250 97/100 without being a native speaker. Although truth be told only because I figured out how to guess well.

1. You can't forge a cryptographic signature

2. Fine the parents


Fining parents because of the bad actions of a foreign tech company would generally fit the definition of "political suicide" for any government dumb enough to do it.

How about fining parents because of the bad actions of a foreign tobacco company when they buy cigarettes for their children? Political suicide as well?

Why not bind it to the phone itself? The phone (or a phone app) would verify you're an adult, and beyond that the website would know nothing but that 1 bit of information.

Children obviously access the internet in other ways too - it's not uncommon for them to share computers with adults or even access the internet via the family television. I definitely remember during covid, most children would be on their parents' computers. Although it would still definitely make sense to do something at the phone level regardless.

There's still the issue of how to verify the user to give them that 1 bit. The current tools do not trust the user or the user's device, because the user could lie or modify the software on their device. But once my ID leaves the device, it becomes a privacy issue. You also have the problem that every pre-2026 device no longer functions with any site that requires the 1 bit.

Isn't this already a solved issue in crypto? You just need 1 trusted website to verify your identity and sign your bit. Instead of having to trust every website.

Indeed. I don't see why the verification process has to be done once per user per website, instead of once per user. That maximizes costs, inconvenience, privacy risks, and compliance failures.

In the California law the verification is just assuming the person who bought the device is an adult.

This creates a grey zone where a 16yo could buy their own device and set themselves as an adult but grey zones like this aren't really a bad thing.

There's also no penalty for lying. If an adult wants a child to have an adult account, they can.


That's how the California law works

> If you want to solve a problem, the tried-and-true path to success is to attempt a solution, try it, reach a bottleneck, try to solve it, and only reach for literature when you’ve run out of ideas yourself.

I've found this to be the right balance between using your creativity and getting stuck too long


https://xcancel.com/OpenAI/status/2067293746556027376

GPT-5.4 reviewed scientific literature, generated and ranked research proposals, helped design experiments, analyzed results, and proposed follow-up studies.

Human chemists steered the work, selected proposals for testing, and validated the final result.

Maria [AI] tested the idea across 10,080 reactions, and human chemists later validated representative results by hand.

Under the optimized conditions, yields improved for 88% of the boronic acids and 83% of the sulfonamides tested.

Human chemists then repeated 14 representative reactions by hand: 11 showed higher yields, including 8 with a more than twofold improvement.

The full process took about 2.5 months, plus another half month for human chemists to write up the results.


Thanks, but this wasn't the link I was referring to


Not to mention VSCode has that too

You can make the centipede grow longer, which makes sense given how this works. Or grow a 2nd centipede for extra points.

haha yes, also the same with the worm

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: