Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | alecco's commentslogin

Altman used to talk about making a religion and Dario Amodei constantly talks about "building a God" and meets with religious leaders including the Vatican.

> It got me thinking, though--the most successful founders do not set out to create companies. They are on a mission to create something closer to a religion, and at some point it turns out that forming a company is the easiest way to do so. [1]

[1] https://blog.samaltman.com/successful-people


I remember reading a similar tweet explaining DeepSeek breaks the insane Chinese work culture. They are against 996 and brutally grinding employees. They feel like a big family and that is their hedge against poaching by Chinese Big Tech with bigger salaries. Liang Wenfeng seems to be the only AI CEO down to earth. I want to believe.

> We're lucky to have China imposing competiton to the western AI megacorps.

The second they get a hold of the market, Chinese Big Tech will be as bad or worse than US Big Tech.

We're lucky to have DeepSeek.


In every market China dominates, Chinese products are still inexpensive. Solar panels, batteries, EVs, drones,..

Because they are subsidized by the Chinese government. This is literally a tactic to destroy global competition.

It's a smart move to make everyone dependent on them.


1. this seems to be based on misconceptions about how the chinese economy works 2. why haven't they done it yet? is the implication that they will wait until they're dominant in some x number of industries worldwide and then... raise prices?

p.s. how would such "subsidization" work on a such a scale? if you think the EVs, PV panels, etc are cheap because the govt like, just covers the loss on every sale(?) where do they get all that surplus finance to cover labour and resources?

have you considered 'subsidies' can be used for accelerating R&D for national interest rather than some monopolistic plot


Any evidence to back that up?

Fact 1: that's terror Fact 2: that's terror


> These comparisons are all gut feelings.

https://simonwillison.net/about/#disclosures

"I have not accepted payments from LLM vendors, but I am frequently invited to preview new LLM products and features from organizations that include OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and Mistral, often under NDA or subject to an embargo. This often also includes free API credits and invitations to events."

But I'm totally unbiased on my gut-feeling posts, trust me bro.

-- AI influencers.


Anthropic didn't give me early access to this model, shouldn't that bias me against it?

You kinda proved the point...

How?

If you're that easily biased then why trust your assessment?

Where did I say I was biased?

the hypothetical you presented above

It was a hypothetical. How does presenting a hypothetical equate to proving anyone's point here?

This isn't some random dipshit, this is Simon Willison[1]. He has a bit more cred than some "AI influencer".

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Willison


I hate how the Instagram/TikTok/YouTube influencer cancer is getting into AI. With early access and all that.

It made sense for people doing proper and fair AI breakdowns waiting on an embargo, but now it's just slop I don't trust anymore.


I often get early access but didn't for this one, it's quite possible there's an NDA in an email somewhere that I missed and forgot to sign.

[flagged]


It is already disclosed [1]:

> I have not accepted payments from LLM vendors, but I am frequently invited to preview new LLM products and features from organizations that include OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini and Mistral, often under NDA or subject to an embargo. This often also includes free API credits and invitations to events.

[1] https://simonwillison.net/about/


HNs problem that they/we keep upvoting him.


Trust fund?

I think the technology is fantastic but the current trend of larger and larger proprietary models will bring a concentration of power/money like never seen before.

It's like we are 19th century farmers and suddenly there are the latest John Deere equipment available for huge amounts of money raising yields 100x. Most of us can't afford the equipment and will be pushed out.

And look who Anthropic is partnering with: the absolute worst of Wall St. like Apollo.



Yesterday:

"SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P" (bloomberg.com) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48405718

Ars used to do deep insightful articles a couple of days after the news but today it's just regurgitated blogspam that is 2 days old news. And way more political. It's sad.


"Denied Fast Index Entry" is a much more honest title than "Rejects SpaceX", which is just click-bait.

Proton's being a bit slow and weird is totally worth it just for the privacy features. And it's slowly improving with time.

Agreed, I left Fastmail for Proton and am very happy with it. It improves/changes in fits and starts sometimes, but support is always great and overall I am happy with the usability, direction, pricing, etc.

I do wish ProtonMail handled labels/folders as one unified model like GMail does, it's so much simpler and more ergonomic. But I imagine hoping for a data model change like that is probably a pipe dream.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: