Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | illiac786's commentslogin

Ha, you just gave me an idea. Add to the prompt “do not do things that will burn over X tokens if the human operator can do it in less than X min, ask for it”.

I wonder if LLMs can estimate effort in tokens?


I just say "if you need something specific or have any questions, stop and ask me for it".

What do you mean “somehow”? You make it sound like people don’t weight benefits and risks. If you do not live in a large city, the benefits are so immense in terms of mobility, they outweigh the risks for most, very clearly. That’s why in large cities, much less people own a driving license for example, the benefits are just not there anymore.

Granted, on the downsides, people look at cost more than risks.


I think they weigh the benefits and risks but then completely discard the risks, because humans are bad at evaluating risks.

More than a million people die each year on the road but for some reason terrorism and cancer dominate the risk assessment of people.

I bet any money that almost all people aren’t really afraid of entering a death box every day to drive to work.

How could they be; a lifetime of brainwashing doesnt let them asses the risk realistically


I thought that these stupid captchas where you teach some AI to recognize fire hydrants without getting paid was rock bottom, but no, you can actually pay a lot of money to train AI. Business is amazing.

Let’s say, it’s extremely unfair to the new generations. They bear crushing social benefits for a majority of old people and are outvoted by the same old people. Until population stops reducing, or social benefits are severely reformed. The latter being the more likely, but not before the economy crashes.

But they’ll be able to live in a recovering environment that doesn’t bear the overpopulation strain.

LOL. The environment will be destroyed but it won’t be getting any worse anymore. They will be delighted. Just a couple thousand years, maybe a million, to wait out – doable.

Probably less than a hundred. We're not talking about a nuclear winter scenario. Look at the Chernobyl exclusion zone (most of which is not radioactive and is closed off as a precaution)

We’re talking climate warming by 2-3°C at least, no one knows how bad it’s going to be. I wish I would share your optimism. At the moment, scientists keep revising their prognostics for the worse each year.

Earth's ecosphere can adapt to tolerate that shift. It's better that we don't fuck it up, but earth has tolerated much hotter and colder periods just fine. It's us and the ecosystem we rely on that we're destroying.

Sure, life will not die out. It won’t be pretty for us humans though.

It has become so tribal lately, do you even have to care about this? Just scream loudly, ragebait 24/7 and you’re good.

I think you’re missing the point, you’re assuming this brief moment will stop. Why would population stop declining?

sex feels good and you need a certain minimum amount of civilization to manufacture condoms

Ok, so civilisation collapse first. Ok, then I agree.

I think the point is, birth control usage is dependent on education rather than how hard it is to get. And maybe it is easy to get in India, I have no idea.

Difficulty accessing birth control is greatly overstated by UN and other development agencies.

In surveys by far the dominant reasons for not using it are "my husband does not want me to" or "my family does not want me to". Those are included in "unable to access".


Money is being created. Land and other resources are not, hence they end up being concentrated in the hands of the super rich.

> Land and other resources are not

Actually, they are being created. For example, people create more land in cities by building towers.


Nothing, compared to the pace at which wealth is being concentrated into the hands of a few.

Wealth inequality leads to lots and lots of power concentrated in a few people. That’s the problem.

It’s a money aristocratic system, and that’s really bad for anyone not belonging to the aristocracy.

And if they continue on this path, we might see heads roll.


1 man, 1 vote.

So your are saying money has no influence on politics? Really?

Rich man, PAC advertising

Political advertising has no effect on my vote. Does it affect yours?

Consider that Hillary outspent Trump 2:1 in the 2016 election, and lost. Same story in 2024, Trump was way outspent by Harris. Harris lost.

Advertising doesn't work if the message is bad.


But then according to the tenets of efficiency of a free market system no candidate would be spending so much on advertisement.

You can't have it both ways, (i) free market is ideal and efficient. Prices are correct and fair etc etc (ii) But doesn't apply to campaign spending.


> Political advertising has no effect on my vote. Does it affect yours?

Oddly, basically everyone says this about advertising in general, and yet it consumes approx 3% of world GDP.


Direct advertising is not the only factor you need to consider. Many powers had been doing political radicalization for years through many channels, including foreign sponsored ones.

Depends on your definition of a bad message. A lie can be very palatable.

Higher performance, I agree, but cheaper?

I didn’t check how much this costs, but if you use AI locally a lot, it’s going to be amortised pretty quickly. Burning 100$ a month on tokens has become insanely easy. I remember when it was unimaginable for me…


This won’t be able to run any of the cutting edge models. And the models it can run can be served from cloud providers for very cheap - like <$1 per million tokens for the latest deepseek.

It’d take many years to break even on your $6000 investment, meanwhile better and better models will come out that the DGX can’t run.


You top out at 20 tokens per second on hardware with memory bandwidth this low for any local model actually worth using. Doing the maths, it’s not financially worth it. Only worth it for privacy and control reasons.

I do love my GB10 Asus Spark-like though still!


I don’t understand your calculation, can you elaborate? At 25USD/Mtk output, assuming your 20tk/s, I generated/saved (minus power costs) ~15k$ in a year.

Granted, it won’t run 24/7, but over a couple of years, this is definitely cheaper.


This can’t run any models that cost $25/mtok lol. I think the fastest model it’ll reasonably run will be GPT-OSS 120B which costs $.05/mtok.

This is a laptop for CUDA devs and AI larpers.


Speculation is it’ll cost at least $6k for 128GB

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: