Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | linhns's commentslogin

Yeah it's in the document but there are no examples on it.

I nearly jumped from GNU Stow, but settled when I find the —-no-folding flag

Some people consider secularism a religion though.


Religion relies on assumptions that cannot be proven physically, secularism just avoids those assumptions (I say this as a Christian who finds secular biblical scholarship fascinating and helpful).


Do you mean an empiricism-only view? That has its flaws as you know.


Secular humanism has been accepted as a religion for First amendment purposes.

Non theistic Buddhism is still considered a religion.

Worldview might be a better term for us to use in understanding people's first amendment rights. And also the idea that there is no neutral worldview. E.g. "secularism" is directly hostile to many religious viewpoints, and to the degree that its proponents use it to oppose religion, secularism becomes a religion/worldview/belief system.


Spot on. This needs to be said more, and it’s why a lot of us do it.


Well then the picks will follow how the numbers are distributed in the training data. More popular numbers will show up more


That's what you'd expect. But we don't know for sure why GPT4.1 chooses 69 only a quarter as often as a random dice roll would. And we don't know if this quirk is reverted by 'uncensoring' a trained model


A bit of crudeness required in this case.


It's not small in the tech community though. Users are not distributed evenly among platforms. Others may have more users but not as many tech users.


Maybe, but I don't use it and nobody I know uses it. It's a very politically divisive platform, and users without an account can't post on there.

There are plenty of reasons not to use X, but that's not what's in contention. X.com was the _only_ platform they shared this information on.

It bears repeating: Github decided not to use email, which every GitHub customer has, and Github chose not to use their sites, and GitHub chose not to use their otherwise active BlueSky.


CLI is much better.


The git CLI in notoriously bad. Nobody would need tools like https://frostming.github.io/legit/ if the git CLI would be any good. Also we would not need websites like https://ohshitgit.com/ Look at the commands: Even Claude Opus 4.7 struggles with that.


I don't think they can blockade it for long anymore.


If I were the hackers, why would I not release the data in this case?

Dumb move from Instructure.


Because then they'll have a reputation of not doing what they're paid to do, which would be the end of their hacking careers.


If they release it now, no one else will pay the ransom


The alternative would be to ruin a part of the life of shitload of students, you find it better? It's not a dumb move at all, most companies pay ransom because the alternative is worse.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: