Futures are far bigger than ETFs, Mutual Funds also far bigger than ETFs, add the OTC / options / total return swaps etc and ETFs are a tiny fraction of the index investing market.
Just use normal dashes. AI's very notably always use the emdash—a double long dash with no spaces around it - but humans tend to use a single dash with spaces on either side.
The AI emdash is notably AI because most people don't even know how to produce the double long dash on their keyboard, and therefore default to the single dash with spaces method, which keeps their writing as quite visibly human.
I think the productivity gains greatly depend on the coding task at hand. You could reasonably design a study that shows AI gains and slowdown depending on the task
I agree with this. But also, part of what made the original study interesting is the DISCREPANCY between perceived vs actual productivity, as opposed to which method "won."
It implies that even if some tasks are better with AI that it might not be so simple for us to judge which method is better for which task.
To me it seems like LLMs are basically memory for humans as a whole. By interfacing with them, you can extract the knowledge, eliminating the need to remember things.
This has been the case for a while with search engines. I'm convinced our brains have evolved (atrophied?) to avoid having to remember things that you can simply look up on your phone in a matter of seconds.
reply