Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mandeepj's commentslogin

"use all of the compute capacity at their Colossus 1 data center"

So, they handed out all of their data center to Anthropic; Grok wasn't using it much?


Moved to Colossus 2. Though I guess you could still frame it as 'don't they need Collosus 1 AND 2' if you want...

Point On! Probably done by two different teams, who don't know about each other. I hate this (re)captcha so bad. They assume everyone is bad.

> possibly because of fears that someone will trick the agent into giving them a refund or something.

Refunds could require approval. And, it could not be just the agent's sole decision.


Not if you want to write code by yourself.

I think there should be another page 'GitHub is NOT down'. Needless to say, for all the other times it's Down.

That’s the classic phenomenon of cheaper pricing due to offshoring! If your expenses are in dollars then for sure recovery is going to be in dollars as well. Why is that a surprise to anyone?

It’s worth mentioning here - the founder (Dhiru bhai) of Reliance used to pump gas in Dubai and that’s where he got the dream to start his own refinery one day. Dream one side, but just going about setting up such a giant production facility at an enormous scale is nothing short of an extraordinary achievement. Pretty sure he had overflow of grit, commitment, and all around strength, and of course high dose of highest level of talent.

Nah, he did it the old-fashioned way - by corruption and dirty dealing, then his family suppressed the people reporting the truth:

https://archive.ph/i3FWt


They're still playing above the law and read anti-corruption regulations as "how to" manuals.

Any source for this claim that Ambani started his career as a gas pumper? Or are do you mean someone else?

Well, he’s single handedly responsible for 1/3 of the debt! And, will add more before his term ends either by force, naturally, or duration completion. He don’t know how to cancel debt, but would happily add more to it and laughingly take home that cash.

Congress is in charge of budgets, Trump isn't a dictator so he can't actually do whatever he wants.

The dude started a war that has already cost $25 billion so far without any approval from congress.

It’s mighty clear he can do whatever he wants, and spend huge sums of money doing it.


Not counting the damages to US bases; it’s pretty significant. https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/01/world/video/us-military-bases...

You should tag this with sarcasm...

I don't think I've unlocked that feature yet.

I don’t think a login wall can stop scrappers

wait, there's more [copied from the top comment of their youtube video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6Bns1T77HM)] -

1. Mandatory arbitration by default. You waive your right to a jury trial and cannot join class action lawsuits. You have only 30 days to opt out after agreeing to the terms.

2. 1-year statute of limitations. You must file any legal claim within one year, which is much shorter than the default period under most state laws.

3. Zed can terminate your account at any time, for any reason, with no liability. No notice is required, and they owe you nothing if they pull the plug.

4. Autocomplete sends your code to AI providers in the background unless you turn it off. Worth knowing if you're working on proprietary or sensitive code.

5. No guarantees about data retention. If your payment lapses, they reserve the right to delete your account and all associated data with no liability.

6. All fees are non-refundable except where required by law, with one narrow exception for disagreeing with modified terms.

7. Zed can modify the terms at any time. For existing users, material changes take effect after just 30 days, and continued use counts as acceptance.

8. Zed can use your name, logo, and brand in their marketing without asking. You'd have to send a written request to stop them.

9. No warranties whatsoever. The service is "as is", they disclaim all responsibility for errors, data loss, or AI-generated output being inaccurate or harmful.

10. Liability is capped very low, at most, whatever you paid in the last 12 months, or $100, whichever is higher.


Why does a text editor have such a defensive license? This is extreme and reckless levels of paranoia.

Zed devs reading this: just release it as GPL. It will be better for literally everyone.


Some of these are questionable, but 3 and 5 stick out. Being included makes it sound like whoever wrote this list doesn’t really know what Zed is?

It’s a local text editor. The only thing an account gives you is access to their specific flavour of coding agent and a collaboration server.

> If your payment lapses, they reserve the right to delete your account and all associated data with no liability.

Pretty much the only associated data is your payment info.


Yeah, screw that.

I am literally shopping for a new editor. A once-a-decade thing for me. I want something that can effectively sandbox local models for code gen.

So I was looking at Zed yesterday. Cloned the repo. Then I noticed they were funded by our favorite VCs.

Between this and CVE-2026-31431 ("Copy Fail"), it seems like I dodged a bullet.


What I do is to have two things, a simple editor, I use helix for normal editing. And in a second terminal a docker container solution where I put opencode or claude in https://git.jeena.net/jeena/agent-container

I think that's why fork "Gram" exists. It strips all the weird parts and leaves just the editor.

By sandbox you mean limit to certain files, certain actions, or both?

I've been wanting to look into better emacs integration for agents. Imagine an agent making direct elisp function calls, or using macros... One could limit which functions are allowed to run similar to how cli harnesses work, but plug straight into LSP and etc.


These are all fairly standard terms.... nothing crazy

lol those are extremely anti-consumer and anti-human behaviors. Some of us don't want to live in a corporate hell holes.

Yes, but the companies want to reserve the right to turn evil later.

If that’s the case, and it certainly isn’t for Emacs, my preferred editor, then it should become non-standard.

Is it? My editor's terms of service seem much more user friendly:

https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: