I do find it funny how mad some people get about this.

Meanwhile, among the yonger generations, "clanker" has been fully established a a term to disapprove of AI for at least a year. though it remains to be seen if it will stick or just be a passing meme, like tge eponymous "6-7" or the now nearly dead "skibidi"

But "corporations are people" and those types of markets have closed since 1865 in the united states.

I can't decide whether it's good or bad that it has included outside information clearly not present in the prompts to make the model. Clearly its the right thing to do if you want "the Pantheon" but I don't think any draftsman or engineer would find this acceptable work.

Exactly my experience with pretty much any Google LLM, they go above and beyond what you ask, even sometimes when you plead for them to not add comments they end doing so anyways, sometimes with "the user asked for X but it would be better if..." visible in the thinking/reasoning even, really strange behavior and exactly what I do not want from my agents.

When you fall on your ass at 63, it hurts for half a month instead of half an hour.

I'll be honest, covid wasn't much different than my usual routine. Maybe it would have been if I lived in a more densely populated area.

If not for modern comms, I am convinced that even in a cold war USA vs USSR style aniliation event, there would still be a handful of people on the far corners of the earth who would otherwise take weeks or months to learn anything happened.

Or you can just take a picture of your monitor with your phone.

>so you can all have the exact job you trained for

Couldn't be any more ironic than being delivered at a graduation ceremony. An equal message could be:

"You know all that time, effort and money you just spent learning something over the last few years? It's useless now. Lamo. Congrats on wasting your life."

If you can get this to read dimensions and apply constraints, you've done it. But that doesn't look like the case.

Every time I see one of these things,its like whoever worked on it doesn't know how to use CAD or understand what CAD is used for.

This.

Every 6 months, I reevaluate how well LLMs can model from scratch or can modify existing files.

It's very superficial (atleast the last time I tried it). I'm guessing if/when LLMs crack visual reasoning, they might be able to do it.

Well visual reasoning is one approach, another is a coding-like approach like this cadquery-based solution https://articraft3d.github.io/ which was also posted here a couple of days ago.. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48153064 Curious what you (and others) think, they also are collecting a pool of examples including prompt, reasoning log and token cost, quite interesting imho.

Come now, do you really think those are the same people?

People who think we can't afford socialized healthcare and people who love military airshows would stereotypically be the same people

"such profanity" is 3 "god damns" to you?