Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | nateburke's commentslogin

I like the ev6!


Penderecki did most of the heavy lifting there


Ha, my almost neighbour from Kraków (from the times I still lived there)!


Agreed. Curious to know if any other prominent voices have delved into the numbers in a similar way?


Is this LBO a ridiculous enough of a proposition that you are going to email your senator and or representatives to complain about LBO loopholes in corporate finance law?

I didn't think so.

I wish them well!


Ti-30x is all you need.


Add on the compounding effect that "QA" or "test" in someone's job description was viewed as a synonym for "less-highly compensated" over the past few decades, and you have an entire generation of mid career devs with poorly adapted instincts regarding what is valuable in the process of shipping working product.

The bottleneck was never coding...


I keep seeing people say that, but the bottleneck really was, to a large degree, writing the code.


Has never been true in my career.


I did this at my last job, it's nice.


Interesting that the algorithmic finance firms are still recruiting. Perhaps they still need a pipeline of rigorous thinkers, or are unwilling to cede significant influence over P+L to llms.


Because the market is eternal competition. If one does something that works others have to figure it out and nobody puts their ideas in open source.


How much drastic would things be if these corporations do open source it? I like to think that markets are fairly efficient so they are fighting tooth and nail for micro-percentage points which granted can be billions but usually what these companies really do is short of fraud at times which can be celebrated by finance (Jane Street frauding Indian investors)

My opinion is that they aren't worried about their competitors so much as the govt.'s patching the loopholes that they do because the only way they are a net sum positive game (in my opinion) is that they make money from the losses of the average person and that too in fraudulent manners at time.

Jane Street's $5 Billion Derivatives Scam Rocks SEBI :https://frontline.thehindu.com/columns/jane-street-sebi-scan...


In the future it will be considered one of the most unusual cultural/social decisions ever, that large financial services firms are as they are in the Western world.

I have never seen a group of people so frantically doing nothing of any value.


Typing code has never been the difficult part of quant finance.


alcohol tolerance, patience, and willingness to work 80 hours a week are probably more important.


Definitely the first two, but the latter is not particularly common at most firms. It's hard to put in the type of thought that you need when you're working that much. It's not slinging power points.

55-60 is much more common.


It feels like xAI is perpetually playing catch-up.

They haven't quite committed enough to a novel direction relative to anthropic or OAI, what's described in the OP seems symptomatic of a lack of differentiation.

If you spend all your time judging yourself relative to the incumbents, there will be no time left over to innovate.

The leash is too tight!


For a brief moment, they were the top performers in benchmarks with the release of Grok 4.

Then they suddenly fired tons of people. Elon does not understand the market and the competition. You can't run a frontier AI lab like any old VC slop company.


Plain and simple this is revenge for the Anthropic super bowl ads, which were epic burns against openAI's primary future revenue stream.


This seems like an exceptionally shallow reading of everything and everyone involved.

You think OpenAI decided to build MurderBot because someone made fun on them selling ads?


I think it's plausible, given the effort he seemed to put into his initial response to the ads: https://x.com/sama/status/2019139174339928189


from the tweet above: "Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be."


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: