Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pdq's commentslogin

High load in the day during sunlight is mostly true for summer heat, but in the winter you have cold evenings which requires base load or storage, combined with solar angle/efficiency being worse in the winter.

> in the winter you have cold evenings which requires base load or storage

If the energy is for heating then there is always the option of storing the energy as heat. Which is much simpler than storing electricity.


Actually, the US uses more power during the day in the summer - there is a dropoff in the night for both summer and winter. Night time use is somewhat similar. [1]

Cooling takes more energy than warming, so the summer daytime use is higher. Summer = warm evenings. I'm from Indiana - it was almost always cooler at 10am than 7pm, even in the winter. It takes time to heat up or cool down. I'll also mention that nights and weekends use less power because business and industry tend to shut down during these times.

Which would somewhat logically mean that despite the efficiency being worse during winter, it isn't as much of a strain because power demands are less.

[1]https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=42915


Cooling doesn't really take more energy than warming, because cooling is warming if you have a heat pump. Are you not just observing here the usage of fossil fuels for heating, which is extremely common?

How common are heat pumps in the states now - and is this something your average worker can afford? I looked into it some time before I moved - and before they were as popular - and installation costs were prohibitive. Moved to Norway over a decade ago. Heat pumps are popular but most homes don't have them here, especially in the cities. I can't imagine that rentals are upgrading, considering its rare to even update insulation in the cheapest rentals.

Are heat pumps common for factories and offices, which account for a lot of energy usage during the week?

Anywhere they aren't common, cooling generally is going to require more traditional methods and the energy cost is greater than just heating. If it were the other way around, poor folks would use a window air conditioner to heat. Cooling pretty much always creates warming - which is the reason it is vented outside.

The energy use I linked to doesn't actually consider where the energy comes from - just the use itself. These methods aren't going to use more or less energy depending on where the energy comes from. Heat pumps would make less usage due to efficiency.


Heat pumps are in most new construction in major cities now - Seattle's required them for years, other cities do too. They aren't significantly more expensive than any other method now, especially with a lot of local utility rebates.

Yeah, it's imperfect.

Does that mean that it is untenable?


Why is this comment upvoted?

It is most likely AI generated with a nice "Raised $50B" hallucination and filled with cliches ("thrown down the gauntlet", "mountain you don’t climb just once", "not for the faint of heart").


Good catch. I didn’t even notice it at first, but the hallucinations on top of cliches gives it away.

The account doesn’t have a history of other comments that have too much of an AI vibe, but this one does. Even if it wasn’t AI, it’s misinformation.


Please see reply to your other comment on this thread.


I wrote this 100% off the top of my head on my phone while eating a sandwich.

Ffs.

edit: removed cursing you out. Sorry but this is frustrating. I don’t leave AI generated comments here (or anywhere else).


Yes. Kenji Lopez has done this experiment using sous vide cooking.

See the chart halfway down here:

https://blog.thermoworks.com/coming-heat-effects-muscle-fibe...


You can just make an IsAdmin() public function to expose it.


A16Z had an article on the lack of IPOs:

https://a16z.com/where-have-all-the-ipos-gone/

Regulatory compliance like Sarbanes Oxley is another huge factor. And VC's having large capital pools make it easy for companies to stay private vastly longer without needing to raise funding from the public.

It's very unfortunate for the public markets, as basic only VC's and PE get access to high growth young companies. Now most of the growth is squeezed out by the VC's and the public gets just the tail end of mature companies.


To be fair, 10-15% of VC money is from pension funds, so there is some indirect participation from the general public


I'm suprised the VCs aren't pushing IPOs more.

A lack of IPOs makes the startup life much less attractive than sitting around at a post-IPO company, which also means a harder time growing the startups the VCs are investing in


> suprised the VCs aren't pushing IPOs more

Harder to charge 2 & 20 on public equities.


I hadn't considered their fee structure.

I guess it also likely not helpful to the VCs to have the public market having real opinions about the valuation that the fees are presumably based on, unless the company is a clear runaway success


If you look right here on HN you will see how many gullible people think there equity will be statistically worth something.

You would be surprised how many true believers there are out there


It just summarized this page and included a few of the images.

[1] https://docs.bsky.app/docs/advanced-guides/atproto


I investigated both and implemented OIDC. It was difficult, but compared to the SAML and XML complexity, I'd say it was much easier.


XML is marginally more complicated than JSON: attributes and namespaces.

Apples to apples, is it's not much different. XSD is just as complex as JSONSchema.

Verbose? Sure.

But people love XML so much, they invented JS-and-XML (JSX). :shrug:


The problem is not XML by itself. XML adds a considerable amount of complexity to JSON[1] and when writing security-oriented software complexity matters quite a bit[2]. But this is still a level of complexity that can be managed. Most other XML-based protocols aren't as bad as SAML.

No, the main problem with SAML is that it relies on XML Signatures (XMLDSig). And the main problem with XML Signatures is that the signature needs to be embedded inside the XML it's signing, instead of being attached to it, like every other signature standard on the planet.

[1] The added complexity is not just attributes and namespace, but also entities, DTD and processing instructions. If you want even the most basic type checking, XML schema becomes mandatory. This is important, since JSON doesn't need a schema for handling basic types, and in fact OAuth 2.0 and Open ID Connect do not rely on JSON Schema at all.

[2] See the OWASP cheatsheet for all the ways accepting XML input from the internet can put your application in danger: https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/XML_Security_...

No equivalent document exists for JSON.


XML=JSON=YAML=TDL (tree describing language)


Not really.


But pretty close.


> If you want even the most basic type checking, XML schema becomes mandatory. This is important, since JSON doesn't need a schema for handling basic types

Huh?

> the main problem with SAML is that it relies on XML Signatures (XMLDSig). And the main problem with XML Signatures is that the signature needs to be embedded inside the XML it's signing, instead of being attached to it, like every other signature standard on the planet.

You are correct that is the hardest part of SAML, but to be clear, there's a SignatureValue element that is separate from SignedInfo.

And you can use a library to sign. I don't see many implementing their own JWT signatures either.


June 4th. Not recent news.

Although this is a clear case of self-dealing by Musk.


General question when running a single member LLC: how do you determine how much to take as salary versus business profit, and how does that affect your taxes?

I'm guessing tax liability is mostly a wash, as if you are taxed as an S-Corp, you pass through the profit into personal income and pay income tax on that.


That’s very much a talk to your CPA question - because it speaks to audit risk. The IRS wants to see you pay yourself a fair salary so you are paying the appropriate payroll taxes, social security, medicare, etc. The problem is “fair” is somewhat subjective and depends on the profitability of the business as well. I’m sorry this isn’t a clear answer, but it’s just not a clear matter. Seek advice and ask “how would you defend this stance in an audit”.


There is no difference in a single member LLC. All profits from the LLC pass though as income which is ultimately taxed at the same rate as salary (including SSI, Medicare, etc).


Kyle Mitchell is a lawyer that can program, and has done a ton of open source work on legal docs: https://projects.kemitchell.com/

For example, here are his employment/hiring docs: https://squareoneforms.com/


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: