just include files over http…that will show’em !

> afaik, xor’ing is faster

Even tiny tiny CPUs can do sub in one cycle, so I doubt that. On super-scalar CPUs xor and sub are normally issued to the same execution units so it wouldn't make a difference there either.

On superscalars running xor trick as is would be significantly slower because it implies a data dependency where there isn't one. But all OOO x86's optimize it away internally.

Sub has the same false data dependency.

commenting without reading the article, your being naughty again :o)

I did read it. A compiler converts your code into assembly. They usually have varying levels of optimisation depending on what you're doing.

The article boils down to "could AI be a good compiler" and I'd say that consistency and repeatability are far more important than a one-off optimisation of a particular section of code. If you've got to the point where a section of code is worth writing some hand-crafted assembly then it's probably worth your time to really understand what's happening with it. Having it "vibe compiled" for you would be a bad idea.

which one ? just curious.

what has _that_ got to do with ipv6 adoption/usage ?

afaics, it probably has more to do with large indian-isp’s f.e. jio adopting ipv6.

don't mind if you do 'guv, don't mind at all.

if you actually got to A.G.I, why would you rent it out ?

yes, run by machines, read by humans. so ?

be bop be bop ! why yes, yes i am.

be bop be bop ! why yes, yes i am.