Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | stupeo's commentslogin

Fair play to them for the way they communicated this. I like their style.

However, I've been a Pro user for several months (use < 1000 credits a month) - but I've noticed a real reduction in quality over the past month or so. I'm now getting random failures, stopping of agents etc.


The same with copilot for office. It was much better before but it seems like they're really turning the screws on the compute. Especially the research agent is pretty useless now and it was really powerful.

I guess these companies are running into issues not being able to expand capacity fast enough. Even a hyperscaler like Microsoft can't power a whole hype cycle. Or they're just squeezing to get more bottom line.


Yeah, that’s right. We’ve removed any identity/auth requirements and have opened up the app to allow anyone to view the KOIs without needing to register. We are just trying to gauge interest in this type of analysis.


Hey HN. I wanted to show a new SaaS we are working on to provide real-time, in play sports analysis for Soccer(Football), Hockey and Basketball.

Our web app is built on .NET, SQL and React.

As it stands, we have a handful of regular visitors but we are looking to ramp this up before we try to monetise.

In terms of our analysis, we are looking primarily at key outcome indicators which include the following factors (+ others)

· How a team has fared subsequently in the game having got the first score or advantage

· How a team has fared subsequently in the game having conceded the first score or advantage

· How well a team can respond to being behind in games (while allowing for the remaining time)

· How capable a team is of scoring outcome altering goals (especially towards the end of the game)

· How susceptible a team is to conceding outcome altering scores (especially towards the end of the game)

These analytics are updated minute by minute when the games are in play.

Any feedback welcomed!


Just a quick update - we know there are some cosmetic/UX issues to resolve and we want to focus more on the design in the coming weeks.

Curiously, our insights indicate not many people even managed to discover/click on the pages that display our unique KOIs etc. Pasted below for easy access - but please do expand the accordions to see the product in action!

Soccer: https://ipsoa-client.azurewebsites.net/fetch-data-soccer

Hockey: https://ipsoa-client.azurewebsites.net/fetch-data-hockey

Basketball: http://ipsoa-client.azurewebsites.net/fetch-data-basketball


About time this problem has specific funding.

With all the disparate systems an NHS member of staff needs to use, they really need a robust SSO and Context Management solution. Even with a wall-to-wall EPR like EPIC there are some huge gaps that other systems need to plug, hence multiple logins and extended waits before a user is productive.


EPIc does allow building out a tab or button for external apps/webpages that handles login?

Except apps that have nothing to do with patients... eg HR.


This make sense for some public sources, obviously not all (such as defense).

As it happens, this is exactly what we do at http://interneuron.org for Healthcare software. Most of our revenue so far has been NHS organisations. We are also a CIC - so a not for profit.


How confident are you on delivering what you are going to sell?

I worked for a global healthcare IT company that was notoriously bad at selling "futures" - modules, functionality and even applications that didn't exist. It came back to bite them on the ass massively - even with a strong and large engineering/test/release team.

Can you phase the product and structure the deal based on that? For example:

1. Sign contract or MoU with enterprise including timelines. 2. Deliver core functionality and realise first revenue. etc.


We’re quite confident at delivering and already have a prototype going. However, most of the engineers are still part-time on this and I’d like to secure something from a prospect to be able to raise funding.

We could potentially phase the product. The other thing we were thinking of is a paid POC/trial.


Any learnings you can share from that experience? Was it overpromising or overextending to too many clients?


This is a really cool app. I like it a lot.

What instruments have you tested it with?


Thank you! I organically made it for sight singing so for voice - Bass, Tenor, Alto, Soprano. But have also tested it with Piano, Violin, Cello and Flute.


Can I ask you to give it a review?? :) Would really appreciate it! Joel.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: