Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That doesn't seem obvious to me. Inventions can change many lives, but the scope of a person's social life is necessarily limited. Why do you say that?


I don't think any amount of human suffering is really worth some perceived progress. Not only because the progress will likely come around eventually anyway if it's for the better, but if we're trying to better humankind we shouldn't start by harming even a single human.


Really? even Alexander Fleming before his accidental discovery of penicillin?


It's a fine line, but if the patients are willful participants then I guess that's a different story.

If they are not willful then I'm unmoved on my stance.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: