In Dutch (technically not too far from English) we only use past and present tense, and although we can mark the future with a special verb like in English, we often don't do that. It is perfectly possible to mark the time with a time marker then, but often this is not necessary to be understood. Relative time can be enough to be clear for the other. (Like "I am short of bread. So I go to the market and buy some. Then I eat it." is grammatically incorrect English, but easily understood, and a correct formulation in Dutch.)
Esperanto has past, present and future and has the possiblity to note the completeness of an action, but it's not obligatory as in English.
toki pona has no inflection and doesn't indicate time at all. If you want to indicate time, you end up using a complicated grammatical construction of causation. Mostly you just make a general statement or indicate time as something coming before or after something else.
Well, Spanish marks subjects of verbs with inflection and requires detailed accounting of objects with pronouns and clitics. In return Spanish gets the opportunity to build a subtle set of emphasis points in sentences.
The final position in a Spanish sentence may belong to the subject, an object of any kind, the verb, or a subordinate clause equally easily. Which thing gets that honored position becomes the topic of emphasis for the sentence. Then whichever one comes first (also flexible) gets the second strongest mark. Things that come along in the middle can get much smaller emphasis depending on order. Adjectives and relative pronoun phrases can change emphasis based on order, too.
In Latin, there is almost no natural order needed. Nouns specify their function in the sentence with declension and verbs attach to subjects with their conjugations. Latin poetry can hold a soup of words in almost any order.
In English and Mandarin order matters. But there is little chance to mark the function of words morphologically. Instead the words stay the same and you rearrange them. That means you can't reorder sentences like you could in Spanish or Latin.
In Dutch (technically not too far from English) we only use past and present tense, and although we can mark the future with a special verb like in English, we often don't do that. It is perfectly possible to mark the time with a time marker then, but often this is not necessary to be understood. Relative time can be enough to be clear for the other. (Like "I am short of bread. So I go to the market and buy some. Then I eat it." is grammatically incorrect English, but easily understood, and a correct formulation in Dutch.)
Esperanto has past, present and future and has the possiblity to note the completeness of an action, but it's not obligatory as in English.
toki pona has no inflection and doesn't indicate time at all. If you want to indicate time, you end up using a complicated grammatical construction of causation. Mostly you just make a general statement or indicate time as something coming before or after something else.