Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
What actually happens if a city gets nuked [video] (youtube.com)
33 points by MKais on Oct 18, 2019 | hide | past | favorite | 15 comments


One of the greatest articles that I have ever read was a narrative of some of the people who survived the Hiroshima bombing, recounted a year after the event. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1946/08/31/hiroshima


# August 6, 1945

  In the Enola Gay
  five minutes before impact
  he whistles a dry tune

  Later he will say
  that the whole blooming sky
  went up like an apricot ice.

  Later he will laugh and tremble
  at such a surrender, for the eye
  of his belly saw Marilyn's skirts
  fly over her head for ever

  On the river bank,
  bees drizzle over
  hot white rhododendrons

  Later she will walk the dust,
  a scarlet girl
  with her whole stripped skin
  at her heel, stuck like an old
  shoe sole or mermaid's tail

  Later she will lie down
  in the flecked black ash
  where the people are become
  as lizards or salamanders
  and, blinded, she will complain
  Mother you are late. So late

  Later in dreams he will look
  down shrieking and see

  ladybirds
  ladybirds
Alison Fell


I had not seen or hear-of this poem before. I'm familiar with the bombing of Hiroshima from a historical standpoint, but I can't say that I really understood this poem. I searched online for an explanation. I found this document. It looks like some sort of literature homework. It helped quite a bit.

http://essalanglit.weebly.com/uploads/1/0/5/4/10543533/augus...


In my agency days, I produced this video (which was part of a larger campaign about surviving a nuclear attack in a city). Was a ton of fun, and quite sobering: https://vimeo.com/29382035


A nuke would not "desintegrate" steel-reinforced concrete buildings.


For me, throwing bombs like this in Hiroshima and Nagasaki are as evil as the holocaust.


I've got some bad news for you... https://youtu.be/LLCF7vPanrY


What's your reasoning?


I don't see a difference on the evilness rate of who kills a two hundred thousand or who kill a million civilians. I understand each side had different reasons, but I am talking just about the evilness on that. During the war, everybody is evil.


Oh ok, so your personal definition of evil just includes every belligerent act.


Yes, when civilians are involved.


Right, so if someone takes military action with a non-zero chance of civilian death then they have committed an evil on par with the holocaust, no?


If he kills thousands, for sure. No difference between thousands or millions, it is the same evilness rate. After some point, there is no difference in cruelty.


What is that point? What is the moral difference between hundreds and thousands, or dozens and hundreds.


You never nuke a city once. To overwhelm missile defense you must send many nukes to increase your odds of success.

So imagine multiple nukes peppering the same city.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: