The reasons given by the authors of a law don't make the law fulfill that objective. In the case of the law you mention, I'd believe it was to protect free speech if they'd included provisions to distribute the official funds between every media outlet, otherwise I'd say it's another way to support only those that think like the current government and stagnate every dissenting opinion.
May I remind you of the Communications Media Law that was passed some time ago, protecting free speech from monopolies?
You're just trolling AND off-topic. You should be downvoted.