Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a combination of the federal reserve both having bought lots of assets and also made a lot of money on the assets it's holding. It's a bit weird. The federal reserve made money on the assets it held in the 2008 crisis. (Buy low, sell high!)


Though more properly, you would need to look at the risk adjusted returns, instead of just the absolute returns.


Further weird because the federal reserve issues the currency in which the assets are marketed... so was there really any risk, in the usual sense?


Yes, there was a risk.

You can say that borrowing from the markets is riskless for the Fed, because it can always pay back with the printing press.

But lending to the markets is still risky: because market participants don't have a printing press to help fall back on.

(In this case, the Fed often also bought some assets and later sold them; that's financially equivalent enough to lending that it doesn't make a difference here.

Especially if the assets you are buying and selling are bonds.)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: