Having a specific opinion isn't inherently a bias, and it's rather uninspiring to put effort into a substantial comment and then get a reply which is essentially nothing but a baseless accusation of bias followed by a long block quote of unclear relevance (it's extremely far from true that all statistical analyses worth consideration are in high dimensions).
Hm, that line doesn't seem bad to me. But I can certainly edit it if you think it's harsh in some way. Which would you prefer?:
1. "I think your view about the difference between Frequentist and Bayesian methods is biased"
2. "I think your view about the difference between Frequentist and Bayesian methods is wrong".
3. Any other suggestion?
A Bayesian proponent wanting an objective standpoint ... Sorry, could not resist :) But I edited the comment. Sorry if it ruined your mood. I shared it with good intentions, not to pick a fight.
Review the Hacker News guidelines:
> Edit out swipes.
https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
EDIT: much appreciated.