Without a society there'd be no education system, no legal tender, no laws protecting employees, no laws protecting companies, no infrastructure supporting it - and so on. So society makes it possible for people to have jobs. There's an old saying that it takes a village to raise a child, which tends to indicate that the group has had a lot of input to the success of the individual for a long time.
I can't even imagine how something as complex as the prerequisites for programming would work without a society. State of nature economies. I suppose you could have small family groups at some point on the hunter-gatherer to farming spectrum, but the minute those families come together into groups and start to develop more complex interactions... that looks mightily like a society to me.
But it doesn't follow from that that society makes it possible for everyone to have a job. Just that those who do could not without one.
It's very close to being the same underlying logical form that goes:
'All cats are four-legged mammals. Buts not all four-legged animals are cats.'
All employees are enabled by a society. But not all people in a society are so enabled.
Do you have evidence of the size and nature of job vacancies compared to the skills and number of the unemployed?